No, nothing to do with the ages of the ladies featured, pervert. Like so much of this blog’s obsession, it’s all about the rules. Rule 34 of the Internet says ‘If it exists, there’s porn of it’ while Servitor’s Rule 18, says: “Try to avoid sessions with clients who have really specific fetishes and can’t get off unless it is exactly right.” That’s what today’s post is. Unlike some Rule 18 images, these ones have captions by the lovely ladies involved who have not taken Servitor’s advice (very wisely, on this as on everything else).
Rule 18
“Try to avoid sessions with clients who have really specific fetishes and can’t get off unless it is exactly right.”
There’s something here I don’t quite follow. Getting off? In the presence of my mistress? That’s not something I’m ever allowed to do. It seems very bad form to me . . .
What an odd idea!
PP
I believe there are some less advanced submissives yet to realise that true joy comes not from satisfying one’s own grubby and frankly better unmentioned desres, PP, but hers. Indeed, in some truly enlightened femdom relationships, the lady does not need to meet or communicate with the sub at all and may even even achieve the nirvana of not knowing of his existence. But sadly for the ladies concerned, not all males are at that level and pettifogging laws prevent them simply being being beaten up until they reach it, hence the need – still – for Rule 18.
Males do have odd ideas, after all. The Rule 18 series – and indeed the blog – is here to showcase some of the oddest.
Good to see you again.
Best wishes
S
Frankly, I count myself fortunate my mistress still permits me to “get off” in private. For now.
PP
I’m sure you deserve it, PP. And should you ever not, I’m equally sure it will be stopped.
Best wishes
S