A while ago I published one of my helpful posts aimed at novice dommes and subs, drawing upon my years of experience to give guidance – top tips, so to speak – so the new generation can avoid the mistakes of its predecessors.
Within that, I suggested what has become known – to me at least – as ‘Servitor’s Rule 18’, namely:
Since then, I keep coming across* images online which can only cause me to think that no one reads this blog. Rule 18 violations abound. Here are a few – just a few – examples
 |
| CFEM play: Clothed Female, Exhibited Male. Note, however, that most clients admitting to a fetish for ‘exhibitionism’ are unlikely to be seeking to be put in a glass case with a small type-written card explaining their provenance and archaeological significance. But for those that do: Rule 18 applies. |
 |
| Eskimo play (more properly called Inuit play nowadays) is actually straightforward enough if you happen to own a punishment igloo and have access to dried seal meat. However, most clients request the domme to wear an outfit (not shown) that can be hot and uncomfortable, so this qualifies for Rule 18. |
 |
| Servitor top tip: if the scene requires knowledge of industrial chemistry it’s probably a Rule 18 violation. |
 |
| Actually, this one’s quite a turn-on for me. Now where’s my sonic? |
 |
| Known in the business as ‘Violet Beauregarde play’, I believe. Dommes attempting it are advised not to use pumps that can exceed the officially recommended pressure (and if not sure, should undertake the inflation in an open public space). |
 |
| Ah, yes: ‘Latex nun birdcage guy’. My SO remembers sessioning with him. She still has the birdcage somewhere. |
 |
| Rule 18… so very Rule 18. |
NB: for anyone taking this all too seriously (a) you’re reading the wrong blog, mate; (b) YKINMK-ETDAMTLN-BIRYKAAMKAFWT**.
* Note to self: remember to add feeble ejaculation-related pun down here.
** Your kink is not my kink – except the dalek and maybe the latex nun – but I respect your kink and anyway my kinks are fucking weird too.
