A while ago I published one of my helpful posts aimed at novice dommes and subs, drawing upon my years of experience to give guidance – top tips, so to speak – so the new generation can avoid the mistakes of its predecessors.
Within that, I suggested what has become known – to me at least – as ‘Servitor’s Rule 18’, namely:
Since then, I keep coming across* images online which can only cause me to think that no one reads this blog. Rule 18 violations abound. Here are a few – just a few – examples
|CFEM play: Clothed Female, Exhibited Male. Note, however, that most clients admitting to a fetish for ‘exhibitionism’ are unlikely to be seeking to be put in a glass case with a small type-written card explaining their provenance and archaeological significance. But for those that do: Rule 18 applies.
|Servitor top tip: if the scene requires knowledge of industrial chemistry it’s probably a Rule 18 violation.
|Actually, this one’s quite a turn-on for me. Now where’s my sonic?
|Known in the business as ‘Violet Beauregarde play’, I believe. Dommes attempting it are advised not to use pumps that can exceed the officially recommended pressure (and if not sure, should undertake the inflation in an open public space).
|Ah, yes: ‘Latex nun birdcage guy’. My SO remembers sessioning with him. She still has the birdcage somewhere.
|Rule 18… so very Rule 18.
NB: for anyone taking this all too seriously (a) you’re reading the wrong blog, mate; (b) YKINMK-ETDAMTLN-BIRYKAAMKAFWT**.
* Note to self: remember to add feeble ejaculation-related pun down here.
** Your kink is not my kink – except the dalek and maybe the latex nun – but I respect your kink and anyway my kinks are fucking weird too.