So take away his vote and things should go just swimmingly. It’s a politics special.
And look, what can I say… I realise not every male pines for a future in which male ‘freedoms’ are abolished and men’s ‘rights’ and ‘dignity’ are crushed under a merciless steel-toed boot of righteous female fury. I get that, truly I do. Whippings, enforced chastity for those permitted to keep their genitals, electric shock collars… it’s not an easy life for males in the female supremacist utopia, I’ll admit. But can you look at how the world is run today – just look at a random headline, almost any day, quite frankly – and tell me, hand on your heart, that it wouldn’t be better like that? Hmm? Really?
I respect a man who goes to a dominatrix. I admire a man who is strong and willingly surrenders to the feminine divine. I think less of a weak man who must be forced into submission.
You know it from everyday life. The most happy man is the brave man who has embraced surrendering to the divine feminine.
I want these sorts of men in my life. Women are great and emotional but sometimes we’re prone to get in petty fights. We ladies need a balance of strong men in our lives who have also acknowledged our powerful femininity.
Men, be a winner and surrender with pride. We welcome you. Don’t be a loser who futilely fights female superiority.
Rosita
Very useful words of inspiration, Rosita, to the men who want to be strong and brave, and who reject female superiority.
Zero out of three for me, alas, but I’m already all in, so broadening the appeal can only help.
Best wishes
S
Well, I imagine that with all men wearing chastity belts, there wouldn’t be any rapes as such.
Perhaps other sexual offenses like leering would still exist, but not rapes as such.
That’s right, Maria. In the female supremacist paradise, leering is certainly a sexual offence. Defined as males ‘inappropriately and offensively looking at a woman with clearly sexual desire’, it is punishable by whipping. There are many other crimes, of course, such as ‘insensitive disregard’ defined as ‘inappropriately and offensively failing to look at a woman who has made an effort to look sexually desirable’, it is also punishable by whipping. Life is hard for men in the new state, but that was kinda the point of setting it up.
Best wishes
S
My wife actually uses a variant of the Hush Your Mouth slogan herself. Namely “Shush your mush”. I think that has a nice ring to it, though that could be down to how many times I’ve heard it by now!
By the way Servitor, is the Lady in pic 5 real or has she been AI generated? I do hope it’s the former.
Spicegrinder
It is a lovely phrase, Spicey. My SO just slaps me in those circumstances, and many others too.
The young lady in pic 5, with the t-shirt, does seem to be real. No idea who she is, I am afraid, but it seems I made the caption in 2018 and I think back then AI was still drawing women with seventeen fingers and mouths that opened sideways, rather than photo-realistic images of ladies with sound attitudes towards the proper place of men in life.
I don’t think she actually looks AI-generated either. I do try very hard to avoid those. There is still a kind of plastic look to the skin, and a certain glassiness of expression for almost all AI images. I imagine that will go within a year or two, and they will be indistinguishable. Which I suppose ought to mean that I shouldn’t care and I should use them, but I don’t feel like that somehow. I actually like the process of trying to find a caption that fits the image, or vice versa and I suspect it would be dull if I could instantly conjure up a photorealistic image of anything at all.
Anyway, good to see you here again.
Best wishes
S
PROP 7732: No Balls For Sex Offenders
The Devil is in the detail. According to some female supremacists, unauthorised (male) masturbation should be classified as such an offence. Along with ‘unwanted sexual looking”.
I raised my concerns with Mistress. She not to worry my big silly head and carry on with my chores.
PP
Sounds like Mistress knows what’s best for you, PP. Leave these complicated matters to the ladies, I say. I’m sure they’ll let us know if we do anything wrong.
Best wishes
S
Thank you Miss Palvin for clearing up my confusion, even though it would be an honour to even have the chance of meeting you.
I still will provide proof to that I voted the party you endorse because it means something for me. I want you to know I do as you please. Not only voting for your political movement, but also wearing a chastity cage and living in complete denial for you.
Quite right, sush. One might think it would be foolish to vote for a political party just out of adoration for a woman telling you to do so. But ,ales are foolish and, anyway, Femsuprem’s entire platform is based on the principle that men should do as they’re told without question and should adore as well as obey the superior sex. So really, although it’s good of the divine Ms Palvin to seek to avoid misunderstandings, ‘because she says so’ is all the reason we need.
Best wishes
S