 |
| Oh well. Being beaten by Simon’s no fun, but there’ll be other guests who want a go too, so… |
 |
| It’s good when fetishes are complementary* like that. A friend of mine went on a date with a girl he really fancied, who turned out to have a castration fetish – and that just wasn’t his thing at all. So he hasn’t dated her since. Or anyone, come to think of it. Sad, really. |
|
 |
| Of course, it’s not just about penis length. Girth matters too. |
 |
| Crush fetish again! |
 |
| Oh. OK. (Damn!) |
|
* Now come on, EditorDomme! Is there another fetish blog anywhere on the Internet that knows the difference between complementary and complimentary? As you know I take (and ocasionally receive) a lot of pains over my grammar. I could of just written any old rubbish, but I choose my words with care.
Note: due to technical incompetence out of my control, I don’t have a good record of which captions I posted between July and October this year (and I am not looking through all the blog posts to check…). So any males reading this who see a caption they’ve seen here before can do some work, for once in their lazy, feckless lives, and let me know in the comments.
LOL! "I could of just written any old rubbish" Now that's a subtle, but brilliant troll! You could've written "could have" but why be proper when you can drive Editor Domme up the wall.
ocasionally
Oh man, you're in for it now…
Shhh!
Why be proper indeed, true. There's nothing very proper about this whole activity really, when you think about it.
ermm… yes, well, obviously that was a deliberate troll too. Obviously.
Moving on…
More giantess pics please :D!
Mmm. I'd like to. Trouble is, I'm, a bit rubbish at photoshopping the little man in. Something about the way the resolution changes or some other thing… it's always too obviously pasted in, like a little cardboard cut-out. I just do words, really. There are people out there who actually are good at the photomanipulation.