Stories and pictures themed around female domination and male subjugation and servitude. Unsuitable for children, for alpha males, for hard-core practitioners with an interest in the politics of bdsm and the mechanics of complicated rope work. Of interest to perverts like me, basically.
How to depict pleasure, cruelty, and wantonness in tempting colours
Ah, the kindness of strangers. Often a welcome relief from the cruelty of our loved ones, but we don’t get to choose these things.
If they were, do ask for clarifications. Believe me, it’s worth suffering a little embarrassment now if it saves you suffering a lot of suffering, later.
Although I’d never be so unchivalrous as to accuse a woman of lying about her age, I do wonder whether Princess really is eighty-three, as she claims.
I made the mistake of growing a beard without seeking my domme’s permission. That session was devoted to removing it: she said tweezers were more effective than a razor blade, and she was memorably right.
Oh, poor Emma. Girls can be so cruel.
Don’t think of it as retirement: think of it as a second childhood filled with misery and terror.
4 thoughts on “How to depict pleasure, cruelty, and wantonness in tempting colours”
Is it common for dommes to have rules about the personal grooming of repeat clients that go beyond ‘show up clean and presentable’?
I have not conducted any survey, shorty. But I do know my first – and eternally beloved – domme had a ‘thing’ against male pubic hair. She did not insist on shaving, but she believed it should be short and neat and she had several methods – none of them pleasant – for removing any she considered excessive.
The delightful “birthday presents” caption draws on a concept I myself have sometimes imagined – involving being held to account for retrospective obligations one couldn’t even have been aware of at the time they were incurred. So deliciously unfair for the submissive, and yet so unarguably reasonable from the only perspective that matters – that of the dominant.
Yes, this could involve having to buy some additional birthday presents. But, in my nerdier moments, I have imagined this concept resulting in financial domination scenarios that extend far beyond the one-off and would instead condemn one to an inescapable and accelerating spiral to complete ruination. Not something any sane man would wish for, but in my wilder moments I do feel rather drawn to the idea.
Imagine a comfortably-off man with a good income and a reasonable level of savings. He meets a seductively persuasive woman of, say, 28. He acknowledges this woman as a goddess worthy of his devotion and deserving of his financial sacrifice.
It feels entirely fitting for him to pledge 80% of his income to her, and both their lives change significantly as a result: she receives tens of thousands of pounds from him each year simply for being the wonderful creature she is, and he is reduced to a humbler existence – living on something like half the minimum wage.
Fairly heavyweight financial domination, but nothing that would leave him permanently damaged. Barring blackmail scenarios, at any time he might decide to end the arrangement, and he would then be able to resume his comfortable lifestyle with all of his assets intact.
But now consider an impactful adjustment to the arrangement – one that brings into play your “just because all those birthdays happened before you met me” clause.
Now, suddenly, the man immediately owes her not only for the year in which he has met her, but that same amount for each of the 10 years since she reached adulthood. That’s a debt of hundreds of thousands of pounds: an amount greater than his entire savings plus his income for the current year – a debt impossible to settle.
The best he can do is to cut back further on his expenses – surviving now in severe poverty – and digging into his savings to cover at least the annual interest on the debt to prevent it growing. In that way, he might last a few years – but once his savings are exhausted the debt will start spiralling upwards and out of control until bankruptcy and unavoidable financial oblivion overwhelm him.
I wonder whether “Princess” in the striking photograph has any idea just how much misery she has the power to inflict by means of those simple words “just because” – I do hope so, as I like to imagine she looks the type to enjoy it.
Best wishes
tom
PS: Of course, if she really is 83 then the maths starts to get rather ridiculous. But, like you, and keeping our voices down so as not to be overheard, I have my doubts.
PPS: Having written the PS above, I find myself wondering now whether “maths” should perhaps take the plural form of the verb “to start” rather than the singular as I have perhaps erroneously employed. I can think of one or two language teachers you have depicted here in previous sets who could probably advise and correct me on that point, and I will naturally be happy to defer to their authority.
I’m sure a suitably qualified female – or, to put it more succinctly, ‘a female’ – should not be constrained by mere considerations of what you might technically have agreed to, tom. Much more important to focus on what you deserve – and what she needs.
We all owe all women an immeasurable debt that can never be repaid but that doesn’t mean they shouldn’t try to measure it and force repayment, after all.
Some time within the next two months or so, the ‘Sunday special’ here will probably be another on deliciously unreasonable behaviour. Something tells me you might enjoy that.
Many thanks, as ever, for your kind words. I do appreciate it, even if I sometimes pay for precisely the opposite.
Best wishes
S
PS – I am reasonably confident that ‘maths’ is singular. But I bend to be corrected, of course.
Is it common for dommes to have rules about the personal grooming of repeat clients that go beyond ‘show up clean and presentable’?
I have not conducted any survey, shorty. But I do know my first – and eternally beloved – domme had a ‘thing’ against male pubic hair. She did not insist on shaving, but she believed it should be short and neat and she had several methods – none of them pleasant – for removing any she considered excessive.
Best wishes
S
Thank you, as ever, for this set.
The delightful “birthday presents” caption draws on a concept I myself have sometimes imagined – involving being held to account for retrospective obligations one couldn’t even have been aware of at the time they were incurred. So deliciously unfair for the submissive, and yet so unarguably reasonable from the only perspective that matters – that of the dominant.
Yes, this could involve having to buy some additional birthday presents. But, in my nerdier moments, I have imagined this concept resulting in financial domination scenarios that extend far beyond the one-off and would instead condemn one to an inescapable and accelerating spiral to complete ruination. Not something any sane man would wish for, but in my wilder moments I do feel rather drawn to the idea.
Imagine a comfortably-off man with a good income and a reasonable level of savings. He meets a seductively persuasive woman of, say, 28. He acknowledges this woman as a goddess worthy of his devotion and deserving of his financial sacrifice.
It feels entirely fitting for him to pledge 80% of his income to her, and both their lives change significantly as a result: she receives tens of thousands of pounds from him each year simply for being the wonderful creature she is, and he is reduced to a humbler existence – living on something like half the minimum wage.
Fairly heavyweight financial domination, but nothing that would leave him permanently damaged. Barring blackmail scenarios, at any time he might decide to end the arrangement, and he would then be able to resume his comfortable lifestyle with all of his assets intact.
But now consider an impactful adjustment to the arrangement – one that brings into play your “just because all those birthdays happened before you met me” clause.
Now, suddenly, the man immediately owes her not only for the year in which he has met her, but that same amount for each of the 10 years since she reached adulthood. That’s a debt of hundreds of thousands of pounds: an amount greater than his entire savings plus his income for the current year – a debt impossible to settle.
The best he can do is to cut back further on his expenses – surviving now in severe poverty – and digging into his savings to cover at least the annual interest on the debt to prevent it growing. In that way, he might last a few years – but once his savings are exhausted the debt will start spiralling upwards and out of control until bankruptcy and unavoidable financial oblivion overwhelm him.
I wonder whether “Princess” in the striking photograph has any idea just how much misery she has the power to inflict by means of those simple words “just because” – I do hope so, as I like to imagine she looks the type to enjoy it.
Best wishes
tom
PS: Of course, if she really is 83 then the maths starts to get rather ridiculous. But, like you, and keeping our voices down so as not to be overheard, I have my doubts.
PPS: Having written the PS above, I find myself wondering now whether “maths” should perhaps take the plural form of the verb “to start” rather than the singular as I have perhaps erroneously employed. I can think of one or two language teachers you have depicted here in previous sets who could probably advise and correct me on that point, and I will naturally be happy to defer to their authority.
I’m sure a suitably qualified female – or, to put it more succinctly, ‘a female’ – should not be constrained by mere considerations of what you might technically have agreed to, tom. Much more important to focus on what you deserve – and what she needs.
We all owe all women an immeasurable debt that can never be repaid but that doesn’t mean they shouldn’t try to measure it and force repayment, after all.
Some time within the next two months or so, the ‘Sunday special’ here will probably be another on deliciously unreasonable behaviour. Something tells me you might enjoy that.
Many thanks, as ever, for your kind words. I do appreciate it, even if I sometimes pay for precisely the opposite.
Best wishes
S
PS – I am reasonably confident that ‘maths’ is singular. But I bend to be corrected, of course.