looky-likey – Contemplating the divine

Getting your unjust deserts

Or desserts, even, if you’re into messy food play (or toilet play, for that matter).

I’ve never disappointed a woman in bed. Sexually, I mean. I spend my life disappointing women in other ways, in other places, obviously.

Why would anyone look closely? Horrible male bottoms… we don’t pay dommes enough for thrashing away at them.

I’d hate to try hypnotherapy, as I have this deep-seated feeling of terror at the thought of losing control. I suppose that might sound odd – in the lifestyle I live with my SO, have I not already lost control, you might ask? Yes, I have, and I spend my life feeling terror – thank you for asking.

The two options are (1) handing them cash and fucking off or (2) handing them cash and not fucking off just yet, in case they need more cash, basically. Of course, they’re not *your* options.

Let’s hope she switches the light off, or you’re in for a sleepless night, I’m afraid. I don’t suppose you could reach the…? No, no I suppose not.

*** **WORDPRESS READER WARNING** ***
Our fact-checkers have red-flagged this claim as ‘Unsupported by evidence. Probable misinformation’. And they reckon the rest of the blog’s a load of old wank, too.

(The real thing: Mistress Eleise de Lacey)

No special Valentine’s Day theme today, you might ask? Well, you see, when you’re in a long-term relationship as I am, you don’t need a special day to show your love. Valentine’s Day is just another day as I see it, or rather, every day is Valentine’s Day.

That’s my take on it.

Unfortunately, my SO took a different view and expected a present. So we discussed it in our usual way and once we reached the part of the discussion where she takes the gag out of my mouth and reduces the tempo of whipping so that I can gasp out coherent words, I explained how for me, every day was Valentine’s Day. So now she expects a present every day. She says she’ll be giving me something every day too, to remember this conversation by. So that’s nice.

They do say love has no boundaries or limits and I’ve certainly discovered that to be the case, today and every day.

Late delivery

So… this is possibly going to be the most pointless and outdated thing I have ever published but I have just noticed a remarkable resemblance between an actress in something broadcast more than ten years ago and a domme whom almost none of you have heard of, who I think retired years before that.

No, really. It’s that irrelevant.

Still here? Oh, OK. Well, the TV series is Going Postal and the actress Claire Foy, more recently famous as the youngest adult version of The Queen in The Crown. In Going Postal she plays the main character’s love interest and her character is aggressive and sexy and actually has a bit of a femdom vibe, dressing in black and on one occasion flexing a whip and saying “You know what happens to naughty boys.” But there’s not much of that, so don’t go looking for it for erotic thrills or anything. Mind you, if you found yourself fantasising about her as a no-nonsense upper class nanny/governess while watching The Crown (you didn’t? Really? Are you sure you’re reading the right blog?), you might like it.

And the domme is of course the world famous Darla Kincaid! No? Ok… anyone who was around when The English Mansion started publishing stuff will have seen her and she’s just wonderful and elegant and coldly amused and all the other things that I, for one, swoon about. She was one of the first dommes I really fantasised about and dreamed of meeting… but I never did and now she’s long, long retired – I think most of her videos were shot around the year 2000 or so. I’m quite old…

Anyway, they, umm… well, they look a bit like each other. I reckon. So: images of Darla Kincaid and Claire Foy below. That’s all. Mini-man story tomorrow.

Photos of Mistress Darla are obviously mainly from Mistress Sidonia’s wonderful English Mansion.

Only barely on topic

…as it doesn’t count as ‘found femdom’, because there isn’t really any femdom in it…

…but the new Wizard of Oz movie does have three delightfully forceful ladies in it, with some confusion about whether each is good or bad (best to be both at the same time, I have always thought, surely?).

Anyway, I think that Mila Kunis is remarkably beautiful. See?

Now where have I seen that hat before? Oh yes – it featured a lot in the early days of OWK. Maybe the film studio bought it in the closing down sale.

Ms Kunis wears nice boots too, and runs very elegantly in them:

Hmm, but yes indeed, OWK did it first:

While her wicked – or possibly very good – sister Glinda, played by Michelle Williams, is (surely) the very image of the divine Ms Eleise de Lacy, from Femme Fatale films:

No, no, you have to look at her face to see the simila – oh, never mind, do what you like.

Don’t you think?

Or have I just been perving around the Internet too much… seeing dommes everywhere (oh I wish I did)?

I thought of trying to find a lookalike for the third sister, Evanore, played by Rachel Weisz. I mean, she’s a little like the haughty (and sadly retired) Mistress Darla, or the clever and witty Ms Slide.

But then, looking like this, there’s really no need for her to look like any specific domme, is there?